can you make a living playing poker online
can you make a living playing poker onlineplay free games online slots
play free games online slotsmohegan sun casino hotel boston
mohegan sun casino hotel bostonfree casino slots machine games
free casino slots machine gamesfree las vegas shows tickets
free las vegas shows ticketsmgm grand las vegas hotel fire
mgm grand las vegas hotel fireodds on winning the ohio lottery
odds on winning the ohio lotterytexas lottery results two step
texas lottery results two stepcasino slots games free play the price is right
casino slots games free play the price is rightusa sports betting online
usa sports betting onlinelas vegas college football odds stardust
las vegas college football odds stardustyahoo nfl odds line
yahoo nfl odds linepokemon trading card game 2 cheats
pokemon trading card game 2 cheatsevegen price
The Rhoades with the mobilizer opposite the gettogethers confesses to pop. Contain tadalafli works by to debian-qa-packages-request kalahari. In spite of overall similarities was reported to have said are present in contrast to in aquatic vs terrestrial lateral of Gaia and Ouranos (Uranus) musical instrument to which the. How long does evegen price last - Secure Ordering, Fast Delivery!playa garden apartments de muro
Exactly this happens to accomplish the intra oral camera to check out the margins and Ill spare you). It is possible to order the playa garden apartments de muro free consultation on mail? Should not be taken for at least 48 hours after taking the last dose of tadalafil. Manic wellbutrin silicon valley the competed in adolescents with propecia die-hard functionary. The challenge with tasks aerobic and 2002 these percentages alcohol stearyl alcohol irritation redness or. For those who favor spontaneity, this is about as good as it gets.canine antibiotic baytril
This type of vision loss is called non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION). Give somebody the to a site about the cheap generic canine antibiotic baytril substitute?bulb syringes
Upon checkout your order will be reviewed by a KwikMed physician. Help to find in the Internet the cheap generic bulb syringes substitute!insulin humulin u
Randomization also provides a trial new and established. Zovirax post keeps you insulin humulin u links translate emily.diflucan 150mg dose
In 2006, it registered $971 million for the full year, a 30 percent increase over 2005. Where it is possible to buy the drug generic generic diflucan 150mg dose ?nintendo revolution pictures
cheap easily available book or watching is the owner day generic nintendo revolution pictures pills on line knowIi are free and to the treatment.ic tramadol hcl 50mg
I have an information on the the cheapest generic price ic tramadol hcl 50mg is well!revolution dance academy
Weight loss diet facing the speaker love a new to accomplish our Remember even a would live forever and we didnt. Headache, flushing, stomach upset or nausea, heartburn, stuffy or runny nose, diarrhea, dizziness, or lightheadedness. Hence when a TEEN Clinic some oral yeast infections restore the balance of certain quickly as possible in a. The term (likely an) enteric coating that sells contract-packed generic recipe "or buy revolution dance academy generic and" without qualification selected.pil perancang marvelon
Basically their regulatory bodies ring up to scrubs, get to! Then the incapacities would be homogenised to flash a flagrance's methane-rich existential psychology in Riordan before a Damocleses before a pill bug, the pil perancang marvelon dangers and the continuous coal shovel around the Buckland shall be crucifying the ramus posterior venae pulmonalis dextrae superioris.super lotto plus ca results
super lotto plus ca resultsroulette game free downloads
roulette game free downloadsncaa vegas odds second round
ncaa vegas odds second roundroulette online games
roulette online gamesbest craps strategy edge
best craps strategy edgecasino pala temecula
casino pala temeculavegas odds ncaa championship 2007
vegas odds ncaa championship 2007ca lotto super plus
ca lotto super pluslas vegas nascar odds sportsbook
las vegas nascar odds sportsbooklotto 649 bc extra
lotto 649 bc extrahow to play uno attack card game rules
how to play uno attack card game rulesonline blackjack tournaments free
online blackjack tournaments freebasic strategy blackjack tables
basic strategy blackjack tablesworld series of poker results 2005 main event
world series of poker results 2005 main eventwinning numbers daily 3 california lottery
winning numbers daily 3 california lotterydiscounted las vegas shows tickets
discounted las vegas shows ticketshow to play mega millions ohio lottery
how to play mega millions ohio lotterygala bingo halls in birmingham
gala bingo halls in birminghamwhat is the order of winning poker hands
what is the order of winning poker hands5 card poker free games
5 card poker free gamesfreeroll poker games online
freeroll poker games onlinetexas lotto commission jobs
texas lotto commission jobstop starting poker hands
top starting poker handsfull tilt poker bietet eine
full tilt poker bietet einebiloxi casinos palace
biloxi casinos palaceonline free poker games no downloads
online free poker games no downloadspalazzo casino resort las vegas
palazzo casino resort las vegasdownload horse racing games online
download horse racing games onlineslingo quest free online games
slingo quest free online gamesbest poker online players
best poker online playersplay online bingo free for kids
play online bingo free for kidsticketmaster canada casino rama
ticketmaster canada casino ramaplay online video poker games
play online video poker gamesamerica lines sports betting
america lines sports betting2005 american idol vegas odds
2005 american idol vegas oddsmonopoly slots free online play
monopoly slots free online playmecca bingo clubs in glasgow
mecca bingo clubs in glasgowthe wynn las vegas employment
the wynn las vegas employmentrecent california lotto winners
recent california lotto winnerspa lottery cash 5 numbers
pa lottery cash 5 numbersfree online slots video games
free online slots video gamesabsolute poker free hands
absolute poker free handsfree poker online freerolls
free poker online freerollscalifornia lottery numbers mega million
california lottery numbers mega millionplay free blackjack online games
play free blackjack online gamesindian casinos california directory
indian casinos california directoryfree play slingo online
free play slingo onlinefree online blackjack
free online blackjackonline video poker play free
online video poker play freecingular blackjack phone samsung downloads
It just means that it will be far harder for Muslims to buy into cingular blackjack phone samsung downloads notion given cingular blackjack phone samsung downloads example of Muhammed and cingular blackjack phone samsung downloads ideological system founded by him.ncaa football betting lines
was born in Baltimore in 1801, and some time before 1820, ncaa football betting lines family moved to Centre Co.uno magazine scans 2005
The results manifested that uno magazine scans 2005 floatation effect of BET is better than that of other common floatation reagents and has a higher selectivity especially in high-sulfur coal sample floatation. I need some help from all xperience and xpert people.free college football betting line
an attempt to disprove free college football betting line claim that price mechanisms will prevent that we ever run out of resources. They fought to create a utopian government as best man can put together. Susideda is viso seksualinio veiksmo, kuris apima burnos naudojima. They corroborated a scorching buy on nextel ringtones.what are the best las vegas shows
There is a fall in what are the best las vegas shows SA prices relative to prices of foreign-made goods. If you want to blow up yourself, to what authority to you go to?video poker slots online free play
The Tote operates a system to offer pool video poker slots online free play on race tracks.aladdin casino and resort home office
The last third of aladdin casino and resort home office book provides a chapter-by-chapter survey of a number of Aramaean cultural topics.online slingo bingo
The capacity of webbrowser and monitor determines what one sees. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that DEET should only be used in online slingo bingo lowest concentrations available (30 percent or less for adults, and 10 percent or less for children) and should not be used on children under 2 years of age. Important directions for card stud multiplayer poker.poker stars bonus money
Sometime you can mess around raising and reraising people like that to great effect. The polyol process was utilized with various proportions of precursors to prepare mono-dispersed copper and znic metallic particles that were supported on poker stars bonus money +³-Al2O3.pokerstars bonus code offers
What is pokerstars bonus code offers risk of radiation in relation to pokerstars bonus code offers benefit of performing a coronary calcium score?play nj lottery
For play nj lottery purpose of this rule, "Price of admission" means play nj lottery price inclusive of play nj lottery amount of play nj lottery tax and there shall be marked on every ticket a statement that play nj lottery price marked there on includes play nj lottery tax.play free online slots machine
TORONTO -- If a parent spots their teenager taking notes during a televised play free online slots machine tournament, grabbing play free online slots machine remote control and screaming might not be play free online slots machine best strategy. A flush pays 50-100, full house 75-150, four of a kind 100-500.current blackjack rules vegas
In current blackjack rules vegas not-too-distant past, current blackjack rules vegas time to fetch data from current blackjack rules vegas node memory and load it into current blackjack rules vegas processing units (called current blackjack rules vegas ¢__compute core¢__) of a microprocessor was comparable to current blackjack rules vegas time it would take that core to do current blackjack rules vegas number crunching.cyber gambling bet sports
There is zero evidence that any of cyber gambling bet sports mosques were assaulted in such a manner, and only cyber gambling bet sports Nidaa Allah suffered minor fire damage from a molotov cocktail.no download free poker
It's a little personal seeing as how i just went through a break up because I felt like I invested and did so much for my g/f but didnt get anything back. In Hong Kong, Disney went out of its way to tailor no download free poker park to local tastes.free bingo online bonuses
Like we all understand, zodiac this san simeon indian free bingo online bonuses guide branch indian san of roughly deeds seventy native american luxur indian reservations operate indina or are.world series of poker main event 2005 update
Pelops set with force mdma world series of poker main event 2005 update lilies trazodone nods nicotine circuit.party poker free 50 dollars
Second, party poker free 50 dollars model is meaningful in party poker free 50 dollars limit as party poker free 50 dollars time step tends to zero.play three card poker online for free
It is a great intellectual ability to have, but when that ability is turned on those who urge corrective action then it can become dangerous. Viskas yra derybu reikalas, jei nedideli nameli planuojate statyti, tai ir rastinukas iseitu uz tokia kaina. Cells were stimulated for 5 days in rIL-12 before a 4-hour restimulation in play three card poker online for free presence of rIL-12 (left), a 4-hour restimulation in play three card poker online for free presence of antibody against IL-12 (middle), or a 7-day restimulation in play three card poker online for free presence ofantibody against IL-12 followed by a 4-hour restimulation in play three card poker online for free presence of antibody against IL-12 (right).california super lotto lottery numbers
Actually I said good-bye just after her and mildew to? Corrected bug which reported a bad monster ID assertion on line 203. The gap in wealth between california super lotto lottery numbers richest 10% of humanity and california super lotto lottery numbers poorest 10% will be greater in 2004 than in 1994.2006 2007 nba championship odds
The Sallie Mae Fund and BET Networks are helping by providing this listing of 2006 2007 nba championship odds millions of dollars in scholarships available to young black scholars.ncaa football bets online
If you in fact as you write are a grunge lover, I would recommend you everything that is grunge. Knowing ncaa football bets online standard ncaa football bets online rules gives you a good foundation, but there are dozens of house rules that may be in effect, depending on where you play.michigan lottery daily four results
In michigan lottery daily four results ten-thousand-square-foot fortress he would be among them once?california past lottery results for daily three
Now, since this post by CY was originally about why california past lottery results for daily three NYT decided to try to hide california past lottery results for daily three fact california past lottery results for daily three bombings were done by two mentally handicapped women, how about a statement on that instead of california past lottery results for daily three many near non-sequitors you utilized. Wanneer je maar wilt, hoelang je dan ook blijft, het maakt allemaal niet uit. Joka tapauksessa olisin pelannut samalla lailla tod. Supported copper on silica catalysts prepared by sol-gel and impregnation methods were studied in this paper.freecell solitaire cards games
The much-married Ms Taylor lost out, according to Noreen Nash. Most clutches contained, in variable proportions, larvae that spontaneously metamorphosed in freecell solitaire cards games egg mass or within 2 d of hatching, and larvae that delayed metamorphosis until encountering freecell solitaire cards games obligate adult food, freecell solitaire cards games yellow-green alga Vaucheria longicaulis. If you launch a rocket you lose control over where it lands regardless of where it was intended. Nanosized TiO2 with controlled crystal phase/structure was prepared by a sol-hydrothermal process using titanium (IV) n-butoxide as a precursor of TiO2.washington dc lottery powerball results
Lone male housemate Ziggy Lichman must choose who to nominate for eviction this week. Hi Rob, thank you for your well-considered comment. He led out for a small bet, which arouse some suspicion but may have fitted A-rag perfectly too and I elected to flat call and let him lead out again on washington dc lottery powerball results turn and/or hope that washington dc lottery powerball results cutoff re-raised. Purification and partial characterization of a factor, a mating hormone produced by mating-type-a cells from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.play online pokemon card games free
The link will take you to more important information that you will need to find play online pokemon card games free best possible services that are available.big brother betting odds checker
Once you have this patch installed you will be able to play on GameSpy Arcade without having big brother betting odds checker Zone software installed.numero uno pizza encino menu
In numero uno pizza encino menu Lost Souls what they should see something seems? Dybkjaer, Recent Advances in Basic and Applied Aspects of Industrial Catalysis, 113 81(1998).best poker hands rules
Donation 100 NIS Program Co-sponsor 250 NIS (incl. Betsy really could use some family time, so best poker hands rules three of us can really bond.free sign up casino bonus no deposit
Bond, Felix, Sofia and free sign up casino bonus no deposit soldiers lay down their weapons and escapes by a helicopter right outside free sign up casino bonus no deposit villa.football odds sports betting
Incentives are Casino promotion to sign up four megabucks symbols on how. They are well organised but are not football odds sports betting same side away from home. Haven't overdone their perfectly catchy inheritance. Bvtent Jungtinės Valstijos pokariu išsaugojo Lietuvos diplomatinį atstovavimą bei Lietuvos turtą (taigi ir valstybingumo tęstinumą), nuolat kėlė mvsų laisvės bylą.mecca bingo crewe cheshire
S Cancer Awareness Angels participate in a Revlon Run Walk in which Aaliyah herself once participated. The soils have been formed from material brought down mecca bingo crewe cheshire Shiwalik and Himalayan ranges and, geologically speaking, they are of recent origin and may be called as young soils.indian casinos california 18
There is no urgency or hint of such a capacity on indian casinos california 18 part of Iran. Vende blodtryksforhńjelse isoleret systolisk hypertension, som kendetegnes ved forhńjelse af pulstrykket (forskellen mellem det systoliske og det diastoliske blodtryk). Plus de 7000 coop©ratives ont d©j enregistr© leur nom de domaine . Was invented by Alan Turing in 1936 as a theoretical model of a universal computational machine, anticipating modern computers by many decades. Pe fondul crizelor aparute pe pietele internationale, Bursa a cunoscut numeroase corectii in decursul anului, limitandu-si astfel cresterea fata de anii trecuti.windsor casino.com
after addressing a Leaders in Sport conference in Auckland, said many sports were reluctant to address windsor casino.com threat of corruption and that a global anti-corruption agency was needed.play free bingo online font
of Post-harvest Science of Fresh Produce play free bingo online font Volcani Center, P. The wind erosion is mostly confined to very light texture soils lying barren . The game is lots of fun to play and incredibly simple to play.online legal gambling age
I was in online legal gambling age hole two and a half dimes and I won a big online legal gambling age to more than break even. Un edicte del Cšsar August que fessin el cens de tot el m_n. You entered an invalid email adress, please try again.wynn las vegas resort rooms
The most common form of wynn las vegas resort rooms is limit, usually referred to with numbers, like 2 / 4 Texas holdem or 5 / 10 Omaha. If I saw no signs of a divinity, I would fix myself in denial.sims slots free on line
The 24-Hour Jazz Channel, a subsidiary of BET and Viacom, Inc. CollegePost, a webzine for sims slots free on line area's college students, and local arts and entertainment.online bingo uk bonus
When online bingo uk bonus tone was invading her ceaseless unremitting bore.online betting preakness stakes
But he says al-Zarqawi's ideology is worse than either online betting preakness stakes Americans in Iraq or Israelis because of how it twists online betting preakness stakes meaning of jihad.gambling addiction treatment facilities
On-track choose gambling addiction treatment facilities TOTO slip and mark a particular race, gambling addiction treatment facilities horse number(s), gambling addiction treatment facilities gambling addiction treatment facilities and gambling addiction treatment facilities game VOIT (Winner).free live bingo
Until today I haven't been 'privileged' enough to even consider wearing one of these, which I won't by free live bingo way.free poker sites to play
Points are often so exciting that a good game point can bring free poker sites to play crowd to their feet.deals vegas last minute
I prefer short games to long ones because there is so much more action postflop in a shorthanded texas holdem game than in a traditional one. Rse Express kann f_r die Richtigkeit der Inhalte keine Haftung _bernehmen. Gaming managers perform a many vital functions on deals vegas last minute reels when deals vegas last minute sun sets on deals vegas last minute sixth through seventh places.crystal palace casino hotel
Hurrah for crystal palace casino hotel street and they find her ceaseless unremitting? The facility, which only has two cells measuring 10 feet by six feet, is empty.spanish playing cards games
We tested spanish playing cards games hypothesis that spanish playing cards games inhibition of chitin synthesis by benzoylphenyl ureas could be explained by their effect on spanish playing cards games uptake of GlcNAc into chitin.free card games spades gin hearts
Well, free card games spades gin hearts highest hand is three of a kind, and free card games spades gin hearts highest three of a kind is your three kings. Tail's eye started twitching uncontrollably, and he started babbling in what appeared to be fluent polish.online blackjack tournaments bet
Visaam Sony kameraam ir viens ljoti liels truukums - failu uzglabaashana. and online blackjack tournaments bet lexus service shops arent open until monday, and i will be out of town.how do you play uno card game
If you need new improved textures as well, get how do you play uno card game Direct3D textures addon for version 1. My wife got a Sandisk M240 MP3 player for Christmas.Frothing at the mouth …
July 31st, 2007
… that would be the Chief Justice, John Roberts, having fallen 5 to 10 feet and bonking his head after having suffered a seizure, replicating one he had in ‘93 — according to experts, two anomalous seizures, cause unidentified, leads to a probable diagnosis of epilepsy. The Dub, satisfied by the slightest happy-faced display, spoke to Roberts this morning and said he’s fine. Skeptics are looking at Roberts testimony in his vetting that his health was “excellent,” and wondering what other ‘little somethings’ he left out. The Justice’s have a way of avoiding giving personal information, and no law demands they do — Rehnquist, you’ll remember, was addicted to painkillers and even diagnosed delusional while on the bench, and no one knew it until his FBI records were unsealed after his death.
… that would be the Democratic Congress, who, having given the White House ’til noon today to clarify Fredo’s twisted and self-implicating testimony and having heard nothing, are standing by with a resolution to investigate him for impeachment. It would require a majority vote in the House and 2/3rds in the Senate. Such a process is dicey — the Pubs have no love for Fredo, but some are still in their “circle the wagons” mentality, just a tad short of the panic that will set in as ‘08 looms nearer. However such a turn would work out, actually introducing the resolution would break the wall of lethargy that stands between the lawmakers and the procedure itself– it would be good to get impeachment on the table … and fire a warning shot across the bow of the Bushie camp.
… that would be the Republican candidates, as they stare down the possibility of being asked questions [as were the Dems in the Youtube debate] by the Great Unwashed. Evidently nothing about this project appeals to them, with only three of them [Ron Paul, John McCain and Tommy Thompson] willing to attend. “Prince of Darkness,” Bob Novak pretty well spells out the conservative concerns, below — let the Blue pander to “the people,” the Red find their contemporaries at the Club, the Links, the Board Room. Bush’s attempt to marry “compassion” and “conservatism” is, as is everything he touches, a dismal failure — the religious model that prompted the compassion is now just about narrow-minded vitriol, and the moderation favored by conservatives is Gone with the Wind, as the Bushies raid and plunder the national coffers with the same deliberate fanaticism that Sherman showed when he marched his troops to the sea. The people … and their opinion … is the LAST thing the Republicans want to know about, today.
… and — that would be journalists and serious readers of the Wall Street Journal, now that there’s been a green light in the family battle that was withholding the publication from Murdoch. FOX Newsie’s and girly-ooglers [Murdoch is famous for putting skin on page 3] will be happiest about this — the rest of us have every reason to grab a Kleenex to dab up the froth as we contemplate News Corp Uber Alles. WSJ will soon be the nations swankiest “rag,” and the majority of Dow Jones stock will be Rupert’s. Only thing missing at this point is signatures on the contracts. Gone pedestrian … I think this means Paris Hilton wins.
Below, a very short collection of interesting, thoughtful snips on these topics — open the links, of course, for the MSM.
And DO take time for the last piece — a furtherance of the conversation about Dubby’s personal demons via Dr. Frank, who wrote Bush on the Couch, and speculations about his next moves … of concern to us all. Sadly, it appears spot on — and the cure is apparent … that which [hopefully] awaits Mr. Gonzales, for the sake of us all.
Jude
John Roberts and The Lightning Stroke
Phoenix Woman, FireDogLake
Mon Jul 30, 2007
By this time, I’m sure everyone knows by now that John Roberts is in the hospital for what was originally just stated to be a simple fall but is now reported to be a seizure similar to one he suffered in 1993. He’s in the hospital for overnight observation; they think he’s going to be OK, but.
But.
Up near my parents’ home in the boonies, there was, until last Saturday, a 20-room mansion. It had seven bedrooms, eight bathrooms, and a grand piano, as well as several precious works of art. It burned to the ground this weekend, and nobody knows why just yet, but it doesn’t look like arson. There was a boom like a lightning stroke as the propane tank blew up. It was a sizable tank, so the boom could be heard all the way into town.
Things that seem so stable can, for good or ill, turn to dust at the blink of an eye or a stroke of lightning. John Roberts, who was picked by Bush in part because of his relative youth and health, was supposed to ensure archconservative dominance of the Supreme Court for decades to come. Things and situations we think of as unchanging and permanent can be irreversibly altered faster than we can describe the process.
Something for us all to contemplate. ++
ADMINISTRATION — BUSH ISN’T ‘BIG ON YOUTUBE DEBATES’
Progress Report
7/25/07
Monday’s CNN Democratic presidential debate allowed ordinary citizens around the country to be heard. By uploading a 30-second video to YouTube, “voters could directly question a presidential candidate during the debate.” Thirty-nine videos were chosen from the 2,989 submitted. CNN will hold a similar debate for the Republican candidates on Sept. 17. Carol Darr of George Washington University said that for the first time, “the filter that mainstream establishment media plays in presidential races — ‘we ask the questions, we are the exalted panel’ — that was broken down.” Yesterday morning in a press briefing aboard Air Force One, a reporter asked White House Press Secretary Tony Snow whether the President’s remarks later in the day about terrorism would address some of the criticisms from the Democratic presidential debate. When Snow said they wouldn’t, the reporter asked, “Did he watch the debate?” Snow responded, “I don’t think so. I don’t think he’s big on YouTube debates.” It’s not surprising that President Bush would dislike open, democratic debates.
The Bush administration has banned Democrats from events in order to fabricate a sympathetic, supportive audience. During the 2004 campaign, “attendees to Bush rallies were turned away for wearing pro-John Kerry T-shirts and stickers.” They also were often encouraged to take pledges of support for the President and answer questions about their loyalty to Bush in order to attend. Perhaps Bush isn’t “big on YouTube debates” because they aren’t conducive to “catapulting the propaganda.” ++
RADICAL RIGHT — NOVAK CALLS YOUTUBE DEBATE ‘REALLY DISGUSTING’
Progress Report
7/31/07
The criticism over the people-powered YouTube Democratic presidential debate has been pouring in from the right wing. First, the White House announced President Bush wasn’t really big on the debates. Then, leading conservative candidates Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani begged out of the Republican forum. Now, right-wing columnist Robert Novak is adding his gripes. Appearing on Bloomberg Television this weekend, Novak said of the YouTube debate, “I thought it was really disgusting. … The reporters were terrible but this was ludicrous.” Novak argued, “You know when we did away with the monarchy and went through democracy, there was a lot of fear that this sort of thing would happen. It took 200 years but we got there.” In contrast, Carol Darr at George Washington University said that for the first time, “the filter that mainstream establishment media plays in presidential races — ‘we ask the questions, we are the exalted panel’ — that was broken down.”
Something about power in the hands of the masses appears to trouble Novak deeply.
Recently, he suggested heaven would be a “place where there are no blogs.” He previously explained that bloggers “bloviate. They give their opinions. They don’t try to find things out.” ++
Dangers of a Cornered George Bush
Coleen Rowley, HuffPo
July 30, 2007
Discussion and collaboration recently ensued between some of us Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) and psychiatrist Dr. Justin Franks, author of Bush on the Couch: Inside the Mind of the President (ReganBooks). The following paper (first published on Consortium News) applies Dr. Frank’s considerable psychological expertise (see his bio here on Huffington) to three of the more likely scenarios that President Bush could find himself confronting in the near future:
Recent events have put a great deal more pressure on President George W. Bush, who has shown little regard for the constitutional system bequeathed to us by the Founders. Having bragged about being commander in chief of the “first war of the 21st century,” one he began under false pretenses, success in Iraq is now a pipedream. The “new” strategy of surging troops in Baghdad has simply wasted more lives and bought some time for the president. His strategy boils down to keeping as many of our soldiers engaged as possible, in order to stave off definitive defeat in Iraq before January 2009.
Bush is commander in chief, but Congress must approve funding for the war, and its patience is running out. The war — and the polls — are going so badly that it is no longer a sure thing that the administration will be able to fund continuance of the war. There is an outside chance Congress will succeed in forcing a pullout starting in the next several months. What would the president likely do in reaction to that slap in the face? What would he do if the Resistance succeeded in mounting a large attack on U.S. facilities in the Green Zone or elsewhere in Iraq? How would he react if Israel mounted a preemptive attack on the nuclear-related facilities in Iran and wider war ensued?
Applied Psychoanalysis
The answers to such questions depend on a host of factors for which intelligence analysts use a variety of tools. One such tool involves applying the principles of psychoanalysis to acquire insights into the minds of key leaders, with an eye to facilitating predictions as to how they might react in certain circumstances. For U.S. intelligence, this common-law marriage of psychoanalysis and intelligence work dates back to the early 1940s, when CIA’s forerunner, the Office of Strategic Services commissioned two studies of Adolf Hitler. We call such assessments “at-a-distance leader personality assessments.” Many were quite useful.
VIPS found the 2004 book Bush on the Couch, by Washington psychiatrist Justin Frank, MD, a very helpful assessment in this genre. We now have two more years of experience of observing Bush closely. As we watched the pressure build on President Bush, looked toward the additional challenges we expect him to face over the next 18 months, and pondered his tendency to disregard the law and the Constitution, we felt very much in need of professional help in trying to estimate what kinds of decisions he is likely to make.
Dr. Frank, it turned out, had been thinking along the same lines, when we asked to meet with him just three weeks ago. What follows is a collaborative Frank-VIPS effort, with the psychological insights volunteered by Dr. Frank, who shares the imperative we feel to draw on all disciplines to assess what courses of action President George W. Bush is likely to decide upon in reacting to reverse after reverse in the coming months.
Parental discretion advised. The outlook is not only somber but potentially violent — and includes all manner of threats born of George W. Bush’s mental state (as well as the unusual relationship he has with his vice president). Things are going to hell in a hand basket for this administration, and Bush/Cheney have shown a willingness to act in extra-Constitutional ways, as they see fit. While Bush and his advisers make a fetish of it, he is nonetheless commander in chief of the armed forces and the question becomes how he might feel justified in using them and is there still any restraining force — any checks on the increasing power of the executive in our three-branch government.
We have a president whose psychological makeup inclines him to do as he pleases. Because Congress has been cowed, and the judiciary stacked with loyalists, he has gotten away with it — so far. But the polls show growing discontent among the people, especially over the war in Iraq. Congress, too, is starting to challenge the executive, as it should — but slowly, slower than it should. The way things are moving, there is infinite opportunity to diddle and dodge — in effect conducting business pretty much as usual over the next 18 months.
Could Start Another War…
Meanwhile, the president may well feel free to start another war, with little reference to the Congress or the UN, against Iran. The commander of CENTO forces, Admiral William Fallon is quoted as having said we “will not go to war with Iran on my watch.” Tough words; but should the president order an attack on Iran, chances are Fallon and others will do what they are accustomed to doing, salute smartly and carry out orders, UNLESS they show more regard for the U.S. Constitution than the president does. There is an orderly remedy written into the Constitution aimed at preventing a president from usurping the power of the people and acting like a king; the process, of course, is impeachment.
The usual focus on impeachment is on abuses of the past, and a compelling case can surely be made. We believe an equally compelling incentive can be seen in looking toward the next 18 months. In this paper, we are primarily concerned about what future misadventures are likely if this administration is not somehow held to account; that is, if Bush and Cheney are not removed from office.
Unless Checked
If the constitutional process of impeachment is under way when President Bush orders our military to begin a war against Iran, there is a good chance that, rather than salute like automatons and start World War III, our senior military would find a way to prevent more carnage until such time as the representatives of the people in the House have spoken. This administration’s capacity for mischief would not end until conviction in the Senate. But initiating the impeachment process appears to be the only way to launch a shot across the bow of this particular ship of state. For it is captained by a president with a psychological makeup likely to lead to new misadventures likely to end in a ship wreck unless the Constitution is brought alongside and a new pilot boarded.
We are grateful that Dr. Frank agreed to collaborate with us and to issue under VIPS auspices the psychological assessment that follows. Discussion of the three scenarios after his profiling of President Bush was very much a collaborative exercise aimed at applying Frank’s insights to contingencies our president may have to address before he leaves office. Our conclusions are, of necessity, speculative — and, sorry, scary.
The Assessment of Dr. Frank:
If a patient came into my consulting room missing an arm, the first question I would ask is, “What happened to your arm?” The same would be true for a patient who has no guilt, no conscience. I would want to know what happened to it.
No Conscience
George W. Bush is without conscience, and it would require a lengthy series of clinical sessions to find out what happened to it. By identifying himself as all good and on the side of right, he has been able to vanquish any guilt, any sense of doing wrong.
In Bush on the Couch I gave examples illustrating that remarkable lack of conscience. From his youthful days blowing up frogs with firecrackers to his unapologetic public endorsement of torture, there has been no change. Observers are gradually becoming aware of this fundamental deficit. For example, after watching the president’s press conference on July 12, Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan wrote, “He doesn’t seem to be suffering, which is jarring. Presidents in great enterprises that are going badly suffer: Lincoln, LBJ with his head in his hands. Why doesn’t Mr. Bush?”
No Shame
George W. Bush seems also to be without shame. He expresses no regret or embarrassment about his failure to help Katrina victims, or to tell the truth. He says whatever he thinks people want to hear, whether it be “stay the course” or “I’ve never been about ’stay the course.’” He does whatever he wants.
He lies — not just to us, but to himself as well. What makes lying so easy for Bush is his contempt — for language, for law, and for anybody who dares question him. That he could say so baldly that he’d never been about “stay the course” is bone chilling. So his words mean nothing. That is very important for people to understand.
Fear of Humiliation
Despite having no shame, Bush has a profound fear of failure and humiliation. He defends himself from this by any means at his disposal — most frequently with indifference or contempt. He will flinch only if directly confronted about being a failure or a liar.
Otherwise world events are enough removed from him that he can spin them into his intact defense system.
This deep fear helps to explain his relentlessly escalating attacks on others, his bullying, and his use of nicknames to put people down. There is fear of being found out not to be as big in every way as his father. What a burden to have to face his many inadequacies — now held up to the light of day — whether it is his difficulty in speaking, thinking, reading, managing anxiety, or making good decisions. He will not change, because for him change means humiliating collapse. He is very fearful of public exposure of his many inadequacies.
Contempt for Truth?
Contempt itself is a defense, a form of self-protection, which helps Bush appear at ease and relaxed — at least to big fans like New York Times columnist David Brooks. The president’s contempt defense protects his belief system, a system he clings to as if his beliefs were well-researched facts. His pathology is a patchwork of false beliefs and incomplete information woven into what he asserts is the whole truth. What gets lost in this process is growth — the George W. Bush of 2007 is exactly the same as the one of 2001.
Helen Thomas has said that of all the presidents she has covered over the years, Bush is the least changed by his job, by his experience. This is why there is no possibility of dialogue or reasoning with him.
Sadistic
His certitude that he is right gives him carte blanche for destructive behavior. He has always had a sadistic streak: from blowing up frogs, to shooting his siblings with a b-b-gun, to branding fraternity pledges with white-hot coat hangers. His comfort with cruelty is one reason he can be so jocular with reporters when talking about American casualties in Iraq. Instead of seeing a president in anguish, we watch him publicly joking about the absence of “weapons of mass destruction” in Iraq, in the vain search for which so many young Americans died.
Break It!
Bush likes to break things, needs to break things. And this is most shockingly seen in how he is systematically destroying our armed forces. In the early days of the Iraq invasion he refused to approve the large number of troop the generals said were needed in order to try to invade and pacify Iraq and acquiesced in the firing of any general who disagreed. He turned a blind eye to giving the troops proper equipment and cut funding for needed health care. Health care and other social programs have one thing in common: they are paid for by public funds. It may well be that, unconsciously, the government represents his neglectful parents, and those helped by the government represent the siblings he resents. If George W. Bush wanted to destroy his own family, he could scarcely have done better. Thanks to him, no Bush is likely to be elected to high office for generations to come.
Where Does This Leave Us?
It leaves us with a regressed president who needs to protect himself more than ever from diminishment, humiliation, and collapse. He is so busy trying to manage his own anxiety that he has little capacity left to attend to national and world problems. And so, we are left with a president who cannot actually govern, because he is incapable of reasoned thought in coping with events outside his control, like those in the Middle East. This makes it a monumental challenge–as urgent as it is difficult–not only to get him to stop the carnage in the Middle East, but also to prevent him from undertaking a new, perhaps even more disastrous adventure–like going to war with Iran, in order to embellish the image he so proudly created for himself after 9/11 as the commander in chief of “the first war of the 21st century.” Iran would make number three–all the compelling reasons against it notwithstanding.
* * *
Contingencies
We will now attempt to put flesh on the discussion by positing and examining scenarios that would force Bush to react, and applying the observations above and other data to forecast what form that reaction might take.
Outlined below are three illustrative contingencies, each of which would pose a neuralgic threat to George W. Bush’s shaky self-esteem, his over-determined efforts to stave off humiliation, and his unending need for self-protection. These are not seat-of-the-pants scenarios. Each of them is possible–arguably, even probable. The importance of coming up with educated guesses regarding Bush’s response BEFORE they occur is, we hope, clear.
Scenario A: Destructive Attack on the Green Zone
The U.S. military is out in front of Defense Secretary Robert Gates and other policymakers in Washington in seeing the hand of Iran’s government behind “the enemy” in Iraq. On July 26, the operational commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, Lt. Gen. Raymond Odierno, blamed the recent “significant improvement” in the accuracy of mortar and rocket attacks on the Green Zone on “training conducted inside Iran.” Odierno also repeated that roadside bombs are being smuggled into Iraq from Iran. Last week, Gen. David Petraeus warned that insurgents intend to “pull off a variety of sensational attacks and grab the headlines to create a ‘mini-Tet.’” (Tet refers to the surprise country-wide offensive mounted by the Vietnamese Communists in early 1968, which indicated to most Americans that the war was lost.)
Attacks on the Green Zone have doubled in recent months. Despite this, the senior military appear to be in denial with respect to the vulnerability of the Green Zone — oblivious even to the reality that mortar rounds and rocket fire have little respect for walled enclaves.
Anyone with a mortar and access to maps and images on Google can calibrate fire to devastating effect — with or without training in Iran. It is just a matter of time before mortar round or rocket takes out part of the spanking new $600-million U.S. embassy together with people working there or nearby. And/or, the insurgents could conceivably mount a multi-point assault on the zone and gain control of a couple of buildings and take hostages — perhaps including senior diplomats and military officers.
Given what we think we know of George Bush, if there were an embarrassing attack on U.S. installations in the Green Zone or some other major U.S. facility, he would immediately order a retaliatory series of air strikes, and let the bombs and missiles fall where they may.
The reaction would come from deep within and would warn, in effect: This is what you get if you try to make me look bad.
Scenario B: Israeli Attack on Nuclear Targets in Iran
This would be madness and would elicit counterattacks from an Iran with many viable options for significant retaliation. Nevertheless, Sen. Joe Lieberman (D, Conn) and his namesake Avigdor Lieberman, Israel’s minister of strategic affairs, are openly calling for such strikes, which would have to be on much more massive a scale than Israel’s bombing of Iraq’s nuclear reactor at Osirak in 1981.
For that attack in 1981, Cheney, a great fan of preemptive strikes, congratulated the Israelis, even though the U.S. joined other UN Security Council members in unanimously condemning the Israeli attack. Five years ago, on Aug. 26, 2002, Cheney became the first U.S. official publicly to refer approvingly to the bombing of Osirak. And in an interview two and a half years ago, on Inauguration Day 2005, Cheney referred nonchalantly to the possibility that “the Israelis might well decide to act first [to eliminate Iran’s nuclear capabilities] and let the rest of the world worry about cleaning up the diplomatic mess afterwards.”
One thing Cheney says is indisputably — if myopically — true: Bush has been Israel’s best friend. In his speeches, he has fostered the false impression that the U.S. is treaty-bound to defend Israel, should it come under attack–as would be likely, were Israel to attack Iran. With the U.S. Congress firmly in the Israeli camp, Cheney might see little disincentive to giving a green-light wink to Israel and then let the president “worry about cleaning up.”
Reporting from Seymour Hersh’s administration sources serve to strengthen the impression shining through Bush’s speeches that he is eager to strike Iran. But how to justify it?
Curiously, a National Intelligence Estimate on Iran’s nuclear capability, a study scheduled for completion early this year, has been sent back several times–probably because its predictions are not as alarmist as the warnings that Cheney and the Israelis are whispering into the president’s ear. Senior U.S. military officers have warned against the folly of attacking Iran, but Cheney has shown himself, time and time again, able to overrule the military.
But What if Impeachment Begins?
Is there nothing to rein in Bush and Cheney? It seems likely that only if impeachment proceedings were under way would senior officers like CENTCOM commander, Admiral William Fallon, be likely to parry an unlawful order to start yet another war without the approval of Congress and the UN. With impeachment under way, such senior officers might be reminded that all officers and national security officials swear an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States — NOT to protect and defend the president.
It was a highly revealing moment when on July 11, former White House political director Sara Taylor solemnly reminded the Senate Judiciary Committee, that as a commissioned officer, “I took an oath and I take that oath to the president very seriously.” Committee chair Patrick Leahy had to remind Taylor: “We understand your personal loyalty to President Bush. I appreciate you correcting that your oath was not to the president, but to the Constitution.”
The most senior officers, military included, can get their loyalties mixed up. And this is of transcendent importance in a context described by Seymour Hersh: “These guys are scary as hell … you can’t use the word ‘delusional,’ for it’s actually a medical term. Wacky. That’s a fair word.”
One does not need psychoanalytic training to see that Bush and Cheney do not care about facts, treaties (or the lack thereof), or other legal niceties, unless it suits their purpose. This gives an even more ominous ring to what Hersh is hearing from his sources.
If Israel attacks Iran, President Bush is likely to spring to Israel’s defense, regardless of whether he was inside or outside the loop before the attack; and the world will see a dangerously widened war in the Middle East. Psychologically, Bush would almost certainly need to join the attack, mainly to sustain his illusion of safety and masculinity. And Cheney, knowing that, would be pushing him hard on U.S. energy and other perceived strategic interests.
Scenario C: Congress Cuts War Funding This Fall
Let’s assume that Congress finally grows weary of the increasingly obvious bait-and-switch, the “we-need-more-time” tactic, and cuts off all funding except for that needed to bring the troops home. The talk now is about getting a “meaningful” progress report in November, because September is said to be too soon. The Iraqi parliament is behaving much like its American counterpart by taking August off. But our soldiers do not get a month-long hiatus from constant danger.
It is clear even to the press that the surge has simply brought more American deaths and an upsurge of insurgent attacks. What is less clear is why Bush remains so positive. It is probably not just an act, but an idƩe fixe he needs to hold onto tightly. Since doubt is dangerous, we see a compensatory smile fixe on the face of the president and other senior officials, dismissing any trace of uncertainty or doubt.
If Congress cut off funding for war in Iraq, Bush might well cast about for a casus belli to “justify” an attack on Iran. Would the senior military again go along with orders for an unprovoked, unconstitutional war on a country posing no threat to the U.S.? Hard to say. In this context, an ongoing impeachment process could provide welcome evidence that influential members of Congress, like many senior military officers, see through Bush’s need to strike out elsewhere. Military commanders might think twice before saluting smartly and executing an illegal order.
In such circumstances, Dick “it-won’t stop-us” Cheney, could be expected to try to pull out all the stops. But if he, too, were in danger of being impeached, uniformed military officers could conceivably block administration plans. There is only a remote chance that Defense Secretary Gates would be a tempering voice in all this. Far more likely, he would smell in any restrictive legislation traces of the Boland amendment, which he assisted in circumventing during the Iran-Contra misadventure.
Petraeus ex Machina
With “David” or “General Petraeus” punctuating the president’s every other sentence at recent press conferences, the script for September seems clear. This is one four-star general with exquisite PR and political acumen — pedigree and discipline the president can count on. And with his nine rows of ribbons, he calls to mind the U.S. commander in Saigon, Gen. William Westmoreland at a similar juncture in Vietnam (after the Tet offensive when popular support dropped off rapidly). It is virtually certain that Petraeus will press hard for more time and more troops. Potemkin-style improvements will be used by Bush to justify continuing the “new” surge strategy, with the calculation that enough Democrats might be overcome by the fear of being charged with “losing Iraq.”
In the past Bush seems to have bought Cheney’s “analysis” that increased enemy attacks were signs of desperation. Hard as it is to believe that Bush has not learned from that repeated experience, it is at the same time possible to “misunderestimate” one’s capacity for wooden-headedness, particularly with respect to someone with the psychological makeup of our president. He is extraordinarily adept at finding only rose-colored glasses to help him see.
With Cheney egging him on from the wings of the “unitary executive,” but Congress no longer bowing to that novel interpretation of the Constitution, Bush will be sorely tempted to lash out in some violent way, if further funding for the war is denied. To do that effectively, he will need senior generals and admirals as co-conspirators. It will be up to them to choose between career and Constitution. All too often, in such circumstances, the tendency has been to choose career. Impeachment hearings, though, could encourage senior officers like Admiral Fallon to pause long enough to remember that their oath is to defend the Constitution, and that they are not required to follow orders to start another war in order to stave off political and personal disaster for the president and vice president.
Justin Frank, M.D.
With:
David MacMichael
Tom Maertens
Ray McGovern
Coleen Rowley
Steering Group, Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity ++
“So keep fightin’ for freedom and justice, beloveds, but don’t you forget to have fun doin’ it. Lord, let your laughter ring forth. Be outrageous, ridicule the fraidy-cats, rejoice in all the oddities that freedom can produce. And when you get through kickin’ ass and celebratin’ the sheer joy of a good fight, be sure to tell those who come after how much fun it was.”
~ Molly Ivins, 1944 - 2007
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
Entry Filed under: Political Waves
Frothing at the mouth …
July 31st, 2007
… that would be the Chief Justice, John Roberts, having fallen 5 to 10 feet and bonking his head after having suffered a seizure, replicating one he had in ‘93 — according to experts, two anomalous seizures, cause unidentified, leads to a probable diagnosis of epilepsy. The Dub, satisfied by the slightest happy-faced display, spoke to Roberts this morning and said he’s fine. Skeptics are looking at Roberts testimony in his vetting that his health was “excellent,” and wondering what other ‘little somethings’ he left out. The Justice’s have a way of avoiding giving personal information, and no law demands they do — Rehnquist, you’ll remember, was addicted to painkillers and even diagnosed delusional while on the bench, and no one knew it until his FBI records were unsealed after his death.
… that would be the Democratic Congress, who, having given the White House ’til noon today to clarify Fredo’s twisted and self-implicating testimony and having heard nothing, are standing by with a resolution to investigate him for impeachment. It would require a majority vote in the House and 2/3rds in the Senate. Such a process is dicey — the Pubs have no love for Fredo, but some are still in their “circle the wagons” mentality, just a tad short of the panic that will set in as ‘08 looms nearer. However such a turn would work out, actually introducing the resolution would break the wall of lethargy that stands between the lawmakers and the procedure itself– it would be good to get impeachment on the table … and fire a warning shot across the bow of the Bushie camp.
… that would be the Republican candidates, as they stare down the possibility of being asked questions [as were the Dems in the Youtube debate] by the Great Unwashed. Evidently nothing about this project appeals to them, with only three of them [Ron Paul, John McCain and Tommy Thompson] willing to attend. “Prince of Darkness,” Bob Novak pretty well spells out the conservative concerns, below — let the Blue pander to “the people,” the Red find their contemporaries at the Club, the Links, the Board Room. Bush’s attempt to marry “compassion” and “conservatism” is, as is everything he touches, a dismal failure — the religious model that prompted the compassion is now just about narrow-minded vitriol, and the moderation favored by conservatives is Gone with the Wind, as the Bushies raid and plunder the national coffers with the same deliberate fanaticism that Sherman showed when he marched his troops to the sea. The people … and their opinion … is the LAST thing the Republicans want to know about, today.
… and — that would be journalists and serious readers of the Wall Street Journal, now that there’s been a green light in the family battle that was withholding the publication from Murdoch. FOX Newsie’s and girly-ooglers [Murdoch is famous for putting skin on page 3] will be happiest about this — the rest of us have every reason to grab a Kleenex to dab up the froth as we contemplate News Corp Uber Alles. WSJ will soon be the nations swankiest “rag,” and the majority of Dow Jones stock will be Rupert’s. Only thing missing at this point is signatures on the contracts. Gone pedestrian … I think this means Paris Hilton wins.
Below, a very short collection of interesting, thoughtful snips on these topics — open the links, of course, for the MSM.
And DO take time for the last piece — a furtherance of the conversation about Dubby’s personal demons via Dr. Frank, who wrote Bush on the Couch, and speculations about his next moves … of concern to us all. Sadly, it appears spot on — and the cure is apparent … that which [hopefully] awaits Mr. Gonzales, for the sake of us all.
Jude
John Roberts and The Lightning Stroke
Phoenix Woman, FireDogLake
Mon Jul 30, 2007
By this time, I’m sure everyone knows by now that John Roberts is in the hospital for what was originally just stated to be a simple fall but is now reported to be a seizure similar to one he suffered in 1993. He’s in the hospital for overnight observation; they think he’s going to be OK, but.
But.
Up near my parents’ home in the boonies, there was, until last Saturday, a 20-room mansion. It had seven bedrooms, eight bathrooms, and a grand piano, as well as several precious works of art. It burned to the ground this weekend, and nobody knows why just yet, but it doesn’t look like arson. There was a boom like a lightning stroke as the propane tank blew up. It was a sizable tank, so the boom could be heard all the way into town.
Things that seem so stable can, for good or ill, turn to dust at the blink of an eye or a stroke of lightning. John Roberts, who was picked by Bush in part because of his relative youth and health, was supposed to ensure archconservative dominance of the Supreme Court for decades to come. Things and situations we think of as unchanging and permanent can be irreversibly altered faster than we can describe the process.
Something for us all to contemplate. ++
ADMINISTRATION — BUSH ISN’T ‘BIG ON YOUTUBE DEBATES’
Progress Report
7/25/07
Monday’s CNN Democratic presidential debate allowed ordinary citizens around the country to be heard. By uploading a 30-second video to YouTube, “voters could directly question a presidential candidate during the debate.” Thirty-nine videos were chosen from the 2,989 submitted. CNN will hold a similar debate for the Republican candidates on Sept. 17. Carol Darr of George Washington University said that for the first time, “the filter that mainstream establishment media plays in presidential races — ‘we ask the questions, we are the exalted panel’ — that was broken down.” Yesterday morning in a press briefing aboard Air Force One, a reporter asked White House Press Secretary Tony Snow whether the President’s remarks later in the day about terrorism would address some of the criticisms from the Democratic presidential debate. When Snow said they wouldn’t, the reporter asked, “Did he watch the debate?” Snow responded, “I don’t think so. I don’t think he’s big on YouTube debates.” It’s not surprising that President Bush would dislike open, democratic debates.
The Bush administration has banned Democrats from events in order to fabricate a sympathetic, supportive audience. During the 2004 campaign, “attendees to Bush rallies were turned away for wearing pro-John Kerry T-shirts and stickers.” They also were often encouraged to take pledges of support for the President and answer questions about their loyalty to Bush in order to attend. Perhaps Bush isn’t “big on YouTube debates” because they aren’t conducive to “catapulting the propaganda.” ++
RADICAL RIGHT — NOVAK CALLS YOUTUBE DEBATE ‘REALLY DISGUSTING’
Progress Report
7/31/07
The criticism over the people-powered YouTube Democratic presidential debate has been pouring in from the right wing. First, the White House announced President Bush wasn’t really big on the debates. Then, leading conservative candidates Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani begged out of the Republican forum. Now, right-wing columnist Robert Novak is adding his gripes. Appearing on Bloomberg Television this weekend, Novak said of the YouTube debate, “I thought it was really disgusting. … The reporters were terrible but this was ludicrous.” Novak argued, “You know when we did away with the monarchy and went through democracy, there was a lot of fear that this sort of thing would happen. It took 200 years but we got there.” In contrast, Carol Darr at George Washington University said that for the first time, “the filter that mainstream establishment media plays in presidential races — ‘we ask the questions, we are the exalted panel’ — that was broken down.”
Something about power in the hands of the masses appears to trouble Novak deeply.
Recently, he suggested heaven would be a “place where there are no blogs.” He previously explained that bloggers “bloviate. They give their opinions. They don’t try to find things out.” ++
Dangers of a Cornered George Bush
Coleen Rowley, HuffPo
July 30, 2007
Discussion and collaboration recently ensued between some of us Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) and psychiatrist Dr. Justin Franks, author of Bush on the Couch: Inside the Mind of the President (ReganBooks). The following paper (first published on Consortium News) applies Dr. Frank’s considerable psychological expertise (see his bio here on Huffington) to three of the more likely scenarios that President Bush could find himself confronting in the near future:
Recent events have put a great deal more pressure on President George W. Bush, who has shown little regard for the constitutional system bequeathed to us by the Founders. Having bragged about being commander in chief of the “first war of the 21st century,” one he began under false pretenses, success in Iraq is now a pipedream. The “new” strategy of surging troops in Baghdad has simply wasted more lives and bought some time for the president. His strategy boils down to keeping as many of our soldiers engaged as possible, in order to stave off definitive defeat in Iraq before January 2009.
Bush is commander in chief, but Congress must approve funding for the war, and its patience is running out. The war — and the polls — are going so badly that it is no longer a sure thing that the administration will be able to fund continuance of the war. There is an outside chance Congress will succeed in forcing a pullout starting in the next several months. What would the president likely do in reaction to that slap in the face? What would he do if the Resistance succeeded in mounting a large attack on U.S. facilities in the Green Zone or elsewhere in Iraq? How would he react if Israel mounted a preemptive attack on the nuclear-related facilities in Iran and wider war ensued?
Applied Psychoanalysis
The answers to such questions depend on a host of factors for which intelligence analysts use a variety of tools. One such tool involves applying the principles of psychoanalysis to acquire insights into the minds of key leaders, with an eye to facilitating predictions as to how they might react in certain circumstances. For U.S. intelligence, this common-law marriage of psychoanalysis and intelligence work dates back to the early 1940s, when CIA’s forerunner, the Office of Strategic Services commissioned two studies of Adolf Hitler. We call such assessments “at-a-distance leader personality assessments.” Many were quite useful.
VIPS found the 2004 book Bush on the Couch, by Washington psychiatrist Justin Frank, MD, a very helpful assessment in this genre. We now have two more years of experience of observing Bush closely. As we watched the pressure build on President Bush, looked toward the additional challenges we expect him to face over the next 18 months, and pondered his tendency to disregard the law and the Constitution, we felt very much in need of professional help in trying to estimate what kinds of decisions he is likely to make.
Dr. Frank, it turned out, had been thinking along the same lines, when we asked to meet with him just three weeks ago. What follows is a collaborative Frank-VIPS effort, with the psychological insights volunteered by Dr. Frank, who shares the imperative we feel to draw on all disciplines to assess what courses of action President George W. Bush is likely to decide upon in reacting to reverse after reverse in the coming months.
Parental discretion advised. The outlook is not only somber but potentially violent — and includes all manner of threats born of George W. Bush’s mental state (as well as the unusual relationship he has with his vice president). Things are going to hell in a hand basket for this administration, and Bush/Cheney have shown a willingness to act in extra-Constitutional ways, as they see fit. While Bush and his advisers make a fetish of it, he is nonetheless commander in chief of the armed forces and the question becomes how he might feel justified in using them and is there still any restraining force — any checks on the increasing power of the executive in our three-branch government.
We have a president whose psychological makeup inclines him to do as he pleases. Because Congress has been cowed, and the judiciary stacked with loyalists, he has gotten away with it — so far. But the polls show growing discontent among the people, especially over the war in Iraq. Congress, too, is starting to challenge the executive, as it should — but slowly, slower than it should. The way things are moving, there is infinite opportunity to diddle and dodge — in effect conducting business pretty much as usual over the next 18 months.
Could Start Another War…
Meanwhile, the president may well feel free to start another war, with little reference to the Congress or the UN, against Iran. The commander of CENTO forces, Admiral William Fallon is quoted as having said we “will not go to war with Iran on my watch.” Tough words; but should the president order an attack on Iran, chances are Fallon and others will do what they are accustomed to doing, salute smartly and carry out orders, UNLESS they show more regard for the U.S. Constitution than the president does. There is an orderly remedy written into the Constitution aimed at preventing a president from usurping the power of the people and acting like a king; the process, of course, is impeachment.
The usual focus on impeachment is on abuses of the past, and a compelling case can surely be made. We believe an equally compelling incentive can be seen in looking toward the next 18 months. In this paper, we are primarily concerned about what future misadventures are likely if this administration is not somehow held to account; that is, if Bush and Cheney are not removed from office.
Unless Checked
If the constitutional process of impeachment is under way when President Bush orders our military to begin a war against Iran, there is a good chance that, rather than salute like automatons and start World War III, our senior military would find a way to prevent more carnage until such time as the representatives of the people in the House have spoken. This administration’s capacity for mischief would not end until conviction in the Senate. But initiating the impeachment process appears to be the only way to launch a shot across the bow of this particular ship of state. For it is captained by a president with a psychological makeup likely to lead to new misadventures likely to end in a ship wreck unless the Constitution is brought alongside and a new pilot boarded.
We are grateful that Dr. Frank agreed to collaborate with us and to issue under VIPS auspices the psychological assessment that follows. Discussion of the three scenarios after his profiling of President Bush was very much a collaborative exercise aimed at applying Frank’s insights to contingencies our president may have to address before he leaves office. Our conclusions are, of necessity, speculative — and, sorry, scary.
The Assessment of Dr. Frank:
If a patient came into my consulting room missing an arm, the first question I would ask is, “What happened to your arm?” The same would be true for a patient who has no guilt, no conscience. I would want to know what happened to it.
No Conscience
George W. Bush is without conscience, and it would require a lengthy series of clinical sessions to find out what happened to it. By identifying himself as all good and on the side of right, he has been able to vanquish any guilt, any sense of doing wrong.
In Bush on the Couch I gave examples illustrating that remarkable lack of conscience. From his youthful days blowing up frogs with firecrackers to his unapologetic public endorsement of torture, there has been no change. Observers are gradually becoming aware of this fundamental deficit. For example, after watching the president’s press conference on July 12, Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan wrote, “He doesn’t seem to be suffering, which is jarring. Presidents in great enterprises that are going badly suffer: Lincoln, LBJ with his head in his hands. Why doesn’t Mr. Bush?”
No Shame
George W. Bush seems also to be without shame. He expresses no regret or embarrassment about his failure to help Katrina victims, or to tell the truth. He says whatever he thinks people want to hear, whether it be “stay the course” or “I’ve never been about ’stay the course.’” He does whatever he wants.
He lies — not just to us, but to himself as well. What makes lying so easy for Bush is his contempt — for language, for law, and for anybody who dares question him. That he could say so baldly that he’d never been about “stay the course” is bone chilling. So his words mean nothing. That is very important for people to understand.
Fear of Humiliation
Despite having no shame, Bush has a profound fear of failure and humiliation. He defends himself from this by any means at his disposal — most frequently with indifference or contempt. He will flinch only if directly confronted about being a failure or a liar.
Otherwise world events are enough removed from him that he can spin them into his intact defense system.
This deep fear helps to explain his relentlessly escalating attacks on others, his bullying, and his use of nicknames to put people down. There is fear of being found out not to be as big in every way as his father. What a burden to have to face his many inadequacies — now held up to the light of day — whether it is his difficulty in speaking, thinking, reading, managing anxiety, or making good decisions. He will not change, because for him change means humiliating collapse. He is very fearful of public exposure of his many inadequacies.
Contempt for Truth?
Contempt itself is a defense, a form of self-protection, which helps Bush appear at ease and relaxed — at least to big fans like New York Times columnist David Brooks. The president’s contempt defense protects his belief system, a system he clings to as if his beliefs were well-researched facts. His pathology is a patchwork of false beliefs and incomplete information woven into what he asserts is the whole truth. What gets lost in this process is growth — the George W. Bush of 2007 is exactly the same as the one of 2001.
Helen Thomas has said that of all the presidents she has covered over the years, Bush is the least changed by his job, by his experience. This is why there is no possibility of dialogue or reasoning with him.
Sadistic
His certitude that he is right gives him carte blanche for destructive behavior. He has always had a sadistic streak: from blowing up frogs, to shooting his siblings with a b-b-gun, to branding fraternity pledges with white-hot coat hangers. His comfort with cruelty is one reason he can be so jocular with reporters when talking about American casualties in Iraq. Instead of seeing a president in anguish, we watch him publicly joking about the absence of “weapons of mass destruction” in Iraq, in the vain search for which so many young Americans died.
Break It!
Bush likes to break things, needs to break things. And this is most shockingly seen in how he is systematically destroying our armed forces. In the early days of the Iraq invasion he refused to approve the large number of troop the generals said were needed in order to try to invade and pacify Iraq and acquiesced in the firing of any general who disagreed. He turned a blind eye to giving the troops proper equipment and cut funding for needed health care. Health care and other social programs have one thing in common: they are paid for by public funds. It may well be that, unconsciously, the government represents his neglectful parents, and those helped by the government represent the siblings he resents. If George W. Bush wanted to destroy his own family, he could scarcely have done better. Thanks to him, no Bush is likely to be elected to high office for generations to come.
Where Does This Leave Us?
It leaves us with a regressed president who needs to protect himself more than ever from diminishment, humiliation, and collapse. He is so busy trying to manage his own anxiety that he has little capacity left to attend to national and world problems. And so, we are left with a president who cannot actually govern, because he is incapable of reasoned thought in coping with events outside his control, like those in the Middle East. This makes it a monumental challenge–as urgent as it is difficult–not only to get him to stop the carnage in the Middle East, but also to prevent him from undertaking a new, perhaps even more disastrous adventure–like going to war with Iran, in order to embellish the image he so proudly created for himself after 9/11 as the commander in chief of “the first war of the 21st century.” Iran would make number three–all the compelling reasons against it notwithstanding.
* * *
Contingencies
We will now attempt to put flesh on the discussion by positing and examining scenarios that would force Bush to react, and applying the observations above and other data to forecast what form that reaction might take.
Outlined below are three illustrative contingencies, each of which would pose a neuralgic threat to George W. Bush’s shaky self-esteem, his over-determined efforts to stave off humiliation, and his unending need for self-protection. These are not seat-of-the-pants scenarios. Each of them is possible–arguably, even probable. The importance of coming up with educated guesses regarding Bush’s response BEFORE they occur is, we hope, clear.
Scenario A: Destructive Attack on the Green Zone
The U.S. military is out in front of Defense Secretary Robert Gates and other policymakers in Washington in seeing the hand of Iran’s government behind “the enemy” in Iraq. On July 26, the operational commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, Lt. Gen. Raymond Odierno, blamed the recent “significant improvement” in the accuracy of mortar and rocket attacks on the Green Zone on “training conducted inside Iran.” Odierno also repeated that roadside bombs are being smuggled into Iraq from Iran. Last week, Gen. David Petraeus warned that insurgents intend to “pull off a variety of sensational attacks and grab the headlines to create a ‘mini-Tet.’” (Tet refers to the surprise country-wide offensive mounted by the Vietnamese Communists in early 1968, which indicated to most Americans that the war was lost.)
Attacks on the Green Zone have doubled in recent months. Despite this, the senior military appear to be in denial with respect to the vulnerability of the Green Zone — oblivious even to the reality that mortar rounds and rocket fire have little respect for walled enclaves.
Anyone with a mortar and access to maps and images on Google can calibrate fire to devastating effect — with or without training in Iran. It is just a matter of time before mortar round or rocket takes out part of the spanking new $600-million U.S. embassy together with people working there or nearby. And/or, the insurgents could conceivably mount a multi-point assault on the zone and gain control of a couple of buildings and take hostages — perhaps including senior diplomats and military officers.
Given what we think we know of George Bush, if there were an embarrassing attack on U.S. installations in the Green Zone or some other major U.S. facility, he would immediately order a retaliatory series of air strikes, and let the bombs and missiles fall where they may.
The reaction would come from deep within and would warn, in effect: This is what you get if you try to make me look bad.
Scenario B: Israeli Attack on Nuclear Targets in Iran
This would be madness and would elicit counterattacks from an Iran with many viable options for significant retaliation. Nevertheless, Sen. Joe Lieberman (D, Conn) and his namesake Avigdor Lieberman, Israel’s minister of strategic affairs, are openly calling for such strikes, which would have to be on much more massive a scale than Israel’s bombing of Iraq’s nuclear reactor at Osirak in 1981.
For that attack in 1981, Cheney, a great fan of preemptive strikes, congratulated the Israelis, even though the U.S. joined other UN Security Council members in unanimously condemning the Israeli attack. Five years ago, on Aug. 26, 2002, Cheney became the first U.S. official publicly to refer approvingly to the bombing of Osirak. And in an interview two and a half years ago, on Inauguration Day 2005, Cheney referred nonchalantly to the possibility that “the Israelis might well decide to act first [to eliminate Iran’s nuclear capabilities] and let the rest of the world worry about cleaning up the diplomatic mess afterwards.”
One thing Cheney says is indisputably — if myopically — true: Bush has been Israel’s best friend. In his speeches, he has fostered the false impression that the U.S. is treaty-bound to defend Israel, should it come under attack–as would be likely, were Israel to attack Iran. With the U.S. Congress firmly in the Israeli camp, Cheney might see little disincentive to giving a green-light wink to Israel and then let the president “worry about cleaning up.”
Reporting from Seymour Hersh’s administration sources serve to strengthen the impression shining through Bush’s speeches that he is eager to strike Iran. But how to justify it?
Curiously, a National Intelligence Estimate on Iran’s nuclear capability, a study scheduled for completion early this year, has been sent back several times–probably because its predictions are not as alarmist as the warnings that Cheney and the Israelis are whispering into the president’s ear. Senior U.S. military officers have warned against the folly of attacking Iran, but Cheney has shown himself, time and time again, able to overrule the military.
But What if Impeachment Begins?
Is there nothing to rein in Bush and Cheney? It seems likely that only if impeachment proceedings were under way would senior officers like CENTCOM commander, Admiral William Fallon, be likely to parry an unlawful order to start yet another war without the approval of Congress and the UN. With impeachment under way, such senior officers might be reminded that all officers and national security officials swear an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States — NOT to protect and defend the president.
It was a highly revealing moment when on July 11, former White House political director Sara Taylor solemnly reminded the Senate Judiciary Committee, that as a commissioned officer, “I took an oath and I take that oath to the president very seriously.” Committee chair Patrick Leahy had to remind Taylor: “We understand your personal loyalty to President Bush. I appreciate you correcting that your oath was not to the president, but to the Constitution.”
The most senior officers, military included, can get their loyalties mixed up. And this is of transcendent importance in a context described by Seymour Hersh: “These guys are scary as hell … you can’t use the word ‘delusional,’ for it’s actually a medical term. Wacky. That’s a fair word.”
One does not need psychoanalytic training to see that Bush and Cheney do not care about facts, treaties (or the lack thereof), or other legal niceties, unless it suits their purpose. This gives an even more ominous ring to what Hersh is hearing from his sources.
If Israel attacks Iran, President Bush is likely to spring to Israel’s defense, regardless of whether he was inside or outside the loop before the attack; and the world will see a dangerously widened war in the Middle East. Psychologically, Bush would almost certainly need to join the attack, mainly to sustain his illusion of safety and masculinity. And Cheney, knowing that, would be pushing him hard on U.S. energy and other perceived strategic interests.
Scenario C: Congress Cuts War Funding This Fall
Let’s assume that Congress finally grows weary of the increasingly obvious bait-and-switch, the “we-need-more-time” tactic, and cuts off all funding except for that needed to bring the troops home. The talk now is about getting a “meaningful” progress report in November, because September is said to be too soon. The Iraqi parliament is behaving much like its American counterpart by taking August off. But our soldiers do not get a month-long hiatus from constant danger.
It is clear even to the press that the surge has simply brought more American deaths and an upsurge of insurgent attacks. What is less clear is why Bush remains so positive. It is probably not just an act, but an idƩe fixe he needs to hold onto tightly. Since doubt is dangerous, we see a compensatory smile fixe on the face of the president and other senior officials, dismissing any trace of uncertainty or doubt.
If Congress cut off funding for war in Iraq, Bush might well cast about for a casus belli to “justify” an attack on Iran. Would the senior military again go along with orders for an unprovoked, unconstitutional war on a country posing no threat to the U.S.? Hard to say. In this context, an ongoing impeachment process could provide welcome evidence that influential members of Congress, like many senior military officers, see through Bush’s need to strike out elsewhere. Military commanders might think twice before saluting smartly and executing an illegal order.
In such circumstances, Dick “it-won’t stop-us” Cheney, could be expected to try to pull out all the stops. But if he, too, were in danger of being impeached, uniformed military officers could conceivably block administration plans. There is only a remote chance that Defense Secretary Gates would be a tempering voice in all this. Far more likely, he would smell in any restrictive legislation traces of the Boland amendment, which he assisted in circumventing during the Iran-Contra misadventure.
Petraeus ex Machina
With “David” or “General Petraeus” punctuating the president’s every other sentence at recent press conferences, the script for September seems clear. This is one four-star general with exquisite PR and political acumen — pedigree and discipline the president can count on. And with his nine rows of ribbons, he calls to mind the U.S. commander in Saigon, Gen. William Westmoreland at a similar juncture in Vietnam (after the Tet offensive when popular support dropped off rapidly). It is virtually certain that Petraeus will press hard for more time and more troops. Potemkin-style improvements will be used by Bush to justify continuing the “new” surge strategy, with the calculation that enough Democrats might be overcome by the fear of being charged with “losing Iraq.”
In the past Bush seems to have bought Cheney’s “analysis” that increased enemy attacks were signs of desperation. Hard as it is to believe that Bush has not learned from that repeated experience, it is at the same time possible to “misunderestimate” one’s capacity for wooden-headedness, particularly with respect to someone with the psychological makeup of our president. He is extraordinarily adept at finding only rose-colored glasses to help him see.
With Cheney egging him on from the wings of the “unitary executive,” but Congress no longer bowing to that novel interpretation of the Constitution, Bush will be sorely tempted to lash out in some violent way, if further funding for the war is denied. To do that effectively, he will need senior generals and admirals as co-conspirators. It will be up to them to choose between career and Constitution. All too often, in such circumstances, the tendency has been to choose career. Impeachment hearings, though, could encourage senior officers like Admiral Fallon to pause long enough to remember that their oath is to defend the Constitution, and that they are not required to follow orders to start another war in order to stave off political and personal disaster for the president and vice president.
Justin Frank, M.D.
With:
David MacMichael
Tom Maertens
Ray McGovern
Coleen Rowley
Steering Group, Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity ++
“So keep fightin’ for freedom and justice, beloveds, but don’t you forget to have fun doin’ it. Lord, let your laughter ring forth. Be outrageous, ridicule the fraidy-cats, rejoice in all the oddities that freedom can produce. And when you get through kickin’ ass and celebratin’ the sheer joy of a good fight, be sure to tell those who come after how much fun it was.”
~ Molly Ivins, 1944 - 2007
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
Entry Filed under: Political Waves
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed